Corporate Services, Inc.
208 Kishwaukee St. · Rockford, IL 61104
(p) (815) 962-8367 · (f) (815) 962-0940

Is In-Person Attendance an Essential Job Function?


Earlier in August, an appellate court had to decide whether a hospital employee could perform her job remotely or whether the job's essential functions required her to come to work in person.

The plaintiff lost the failure-to-accommodate claim she asserted under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The Seventh Circuit's (Ill., Ind., Wis.) analysis may clarify whether regular work attendance is essential for the job.

The court began by acknowledging that "precedents have generally disfavored working from home because such an arrangement makes teamwork and supervision of productivity difficult," in which the court "has focused less on particular facts to see whether a certain job required tasks that must be performed in person and more generally on why attending work in person is a basic requirement." The result was often an easy win for the employer — or it was.

Even before COVID-19, courts began to appreciate that technology made working from home more feasible so that employers cannot rely on an automatic presumption working from home is unreasonable. The relative success of remote work during the pandemic reinforced that point.

However, working from home does not necessarily negate in-person attendance as an essential job function. Here are four considerations that the Seventh Circuit highlighted:

  1. Job description. First, have one. Second, it should contain information that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the essential functions must be performed at the office. In this case, the plaintiff was to serve as a "liaison" between various constituents at work. It also required oversight of sophisticated equipment found in the office.
  2. Get input from colleagues. The ADA does not require reassigning essential job functions. So, if, for example, colleagues complain that they are shouldering too much of a remote worker's job duties, that indicates that coming to the office is essential.
  3. Ask supervisors. The plaintiff's supervisor testified that her role required her to work in person. Self-serving statements do not count for much. However, if the remote worker concedes that they rely on others in the office to help perform their job, the supervisor's say-so means much more.
  4. Talk to subordinates, too. Do they feel that they are lacking guidance, supervision, or confidence? Or are they having trouble building relationships with a remote supervisor? All of this matters.

Ultimately, this is a fact-specific inquiry. Also, remember that the conversation does not end at "in-person or bust." Explore other accommodations that make the employee feel more comfortable coming to the office.

Posted In: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Reasonable Accommodation

Want to know more? Read the full article by at The Employer Handbook

More News from Corporate Services, Inc.

Court Finds DACA Final Rule Unlawful

On September 13, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas issued a decision finding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) final rule unlawful.more

Is It Retaliation After the Plaintiff Loses?

In a recent Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (Louisiana) decision, the plaintiffs brought gender discrimination (equal pay) and retaliation claims after the defendants terminated their positions as part of a university-wide consolidation.more

The EEOC and DOL Are Teaming Up

Chances are, if one of your employees complained about discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) took an interest in your company's business.more